Passage: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. The primary economic development strategy of local governments in the United States during the 1960s and 1970s was to attract manufacturing industries. Unfortunately, this strategy was usually implemented at another community’s expense: many manufacturing facilities were lured away from their moorings elsewhere through tax incentives and slick promotional efforts. Through the transfer of jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town’s triumph could become another town’s tragedy. In the 1980’s the strategy shifted from this zero- sum game to one called “high-technology development,” in which local governments competed to attract newly formed high-technology manufacturing firms. Although this approach was preferable to victimising other geographical areas by taking their jobs, it also had its shortcomings: high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, and there simply are not enough high-tech firms to satisfy all geographic areas. Recently, local governments have increasingly come to recognise the advantages of yet a third strategy: the promotion of homegrown small businesses. Small indigenous businesses are created by a nearly ubiquitous resource, local entrepreneurs. With roots in their communities, these individuals are less likely to be enticed away by incentives offered by another community. Question: What is the advantage of high-technology development according to the author of the passage?

1. The high-technology does not advantage any local workforce at the cost of another.
2. The high-technology takes full advantage of the existing workforce.
3. The high-technology promotes healthy competition between rival industries.
4. The growth of related industries is encouraged by high-technology.